ArticleScience advances2026
Bridging electron microscopy and materials analysis with an autonomous agentic platform.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electron microscopy (EM) reveals atomic-scale structures that underpin catalysis, energy storage, and semiconductor reliability, yet current workflows remain fragmented across segmentation, crystallographic reconstruction, property modeling, and literature review, often requiring weeks of expert effort. Although recent artificial intelligence models have assisted individual steps, the diversity of EM modalities and tasks means existing approaches remain siloed and perform poorly in complex multistage workflows. We present EMSeek, a modular, provenance-tracked multiagent platform that connects EM to materials insight through five key units: reference-guided one-for-all segmentation, mask-aware reconstruction of crystal structures from EM data, a gated mixture of experts property predictor with uncertainty calibration, literature retrieval with citation anchoring, and physical consistency checks with audit-ready reporting. These units are orchestrated by large language models (LLMs) that automatically plan, invoke, and execute tools, minimizing human intervention. On 20 material systems and five tasks, EMSeek delivers segmentation about twice as fast as Segment Anything with higher accuracy, achieves more than 90% structural similarity on STEM2Mat, and, with about 2% labeled calibration, matches or surpasses strong single experts on three out-of-distribution property benchmarks. A complete query runs in 2 to 5 minutes per image, roughly 50 times faster than expert workflows. Case studies on two-dimensional lattices and nanoparticles validate EMSeek's ability to automate complex workflows, with integrated uncertainty calibration and audit signals that provide scientists with rigorous yet actionable guidance to accelerate materials discovery.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.