ReviewEndocrine-related cancer2026
Reproductive and sexual sequelae of neuroendocrine tumour therapies: an under-recognised challenge.
Review in Endocrine-related cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are heterogeneous, biologically variable tumours arising from the diffuse neuroendocrine system. While more frequently seen in older patients, the incidence and prevalence of NETs in the younger population are increasing. In addition, because of their generally slow progression and favourable prognosis, coupled with widely available effective treatments, survival times even with metastatic tumours may often be prolonged. However, there is a paucity of data on the effect of treatment of NETs on men's and women's reproductive and sexual health. In this review, we have evaluated the effects of NET therapies, including somatostatin analogues (SSTAs), molecular targeted therapy (everolimus and sunitinib), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and chemotherapy, on reproductive and sexual function in patients with NETs. There is a lack of evidence on the detrimental effects of SSTAs on human fertility, and indeed, many patients have conceived successfully after many years of treatment with SSTAs. Even patients who have received SSTAs during pregnancy have generally shown positive maternal and fetal outcomes. While the effects of PRRT and molecular targeted therapy on fertility are as yet poorly defined, chemotherapy has a proven negative impact on fertility; thus, family and pregnancy planning are strongly recommended before the initiation of chemotherapy. Finally, data on the effects of NET treatment on sexual function are very limited; however, neuroendocrine tumours can express oestrogen receptors/progesterone receptors (ER/PR) or testosterone receptors (TR); thus, checking tumour tissue for ER/PR/TR status prior to considering hormonal therapy for sexual dysfunction should be considered but warrants additional studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.