ArticleScientific reports2026
A feasibility study of deep learning-based segmentation of the inferior alveolar nerve on magnetic resonance neurography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is the major sensory nerve innervating the mandibular region, and its automatic segmentation is crucial. It has been indirectly identified on the mandibular canal, which surrounds the IAN, using computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is an imaging technique designed for nerve visualization, facilitating discrimination of small peripheral nerves from surrounding soft tissues. To our knowledge, this study is the first to perform semi-automatic segmentation of the IAN using MRN images. We developed a deep learning model based on 6,027 coronal MRN images and evaluated its performance using four quantitative metrics, comparing it with six state-of-the-art models that were retrained and tested on the same dataset for small-structure segmentation. Our model achieved a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.712 ± 0.254, significantly outperforming the six comparator models. In addition, in an analysis of segmentation failure rates according to DSC thresholds, our model demonstrated the lowest failure rate. In conclusion, unlike many previous studies that focused on bony boundaries using CBCT or CT, this study demonstrates the feasibility and potential clinical utility of MRN-based IAN segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.