Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41922965›Full record

SynthesisBMC bioinformatics2026

Machine learning for multi-omics data integration in crop improvement: a systematic review.

Alemu Tsega, Destaw Mullualem

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alemu TsegaDepartment of Biology, Natural and computational science, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia. alexttsega@gmail.com.
Destaw MullualemDepartment of Biology, Natural and computational science, Injibara University, Injibara, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis systematic review synthesizes applications of machine learning (ML) for multi-omics data integration in crop improvement, evaluating its dual potential to enhance predictive accuracy for selection (breeding utility) and to generate interpretable biological insights (mechanistic discovery).

methodsFollowing a systematic review of 76 eligible studies, we synthesized patterns in methodological adoption.

resultsThe integration of environmental data (envirotyping) with multiple omics layers for genotype-by-environment (G×E) prediction was identified as a major emerging frontier, though currently addressed in fewer than 20% of studies. Tree-based models such as random forest and XGBoost were the most prevalent, favored for their interpretability and robustness with small to medium-sized datasets. In contrast, deep learning approaches, while reporting high performance, were primarily applied to larger datasets and constrained by higher computational costs. Emerging hybrid models show promise, but their efficacy is highly architecture- dependent. The most consistent accuracy gains (10–15%) were observed for feature-engineering hybrids (autoencoders compressing multi-omics data followed by XGBoost). Stacking ensembles showed more variable performance (5–12% gains), while integrated hybrids like convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) delivered high accuracy for specific data structures. A recurring trend indicated that genomics with transcriptomics frequently boosted prediction for stress-related traits, while genomics with metabolomics excelled for quality traits. Tri-omics integration enhanced prediction for complex yield traits, though with marginal gains (< 5%) and substantial computational cost increases. Comparatively, ML-based approaches often outperformed classical genomic selection (GS) for low-heritability traits, while GS remained competitive for high-heritability traits. Deep learning models showed particular strength in handling population structure, reducing prediction errors by up to 20% in diverse panels. Critical gaps were identified: an overwhelming focus on point estimates of accuracy, (with fewer than 10% of studies reporting calibrated uncertainty metrics: and a relative scarcity of intrinsically interpretable model architectures that incorporates biological constraints as a core design principle.

conclusionML- driven multi-omics integration holds transformative potential but requires strategic implementation tailored to specific breeding objectives, trait architecture, and resource availability. Collective efforts to standardize data protocols, enhance model interpretability, and democratize computational tools are critical. Realizing equitable potential requires strategies to develop user-friendly platforms that extend advances to under-resourced crops. Transfer learning from data-rich species and federated data-sharing models are concrete avenues for promoting equitable innovations and enhancing global agricultural resilience.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsGenomicsMultiomicsPredictive Learning ModelsCrop breedingDeep learningExplainable AI (XAI)Genomic predictionGenotype-by-environment (G×E) interactionsMachine learningMulti-omics data integrationPlant phenomicsPrecision agricultureTansfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41922965
PMCPMC13054975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.