SynthesisBMC bioinformatics2026
Machine learning for multi-omics data integration in crop improvement: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond static snapshots: predicting dynamic, explainable intermediate phenotypes for climate-resilient crop breeding.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- AI-integrated digital breeding for crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review synthesizes applications of machine learning (ML) for multi-omics data integration in crop improvement, evaluating its dual potential to enhance predictive accuracy for selection (breeding utility) and to generate interpretable biological insights (mechanistic discovery).
methodsFollowing a systematic review of 76 eligible studies, we synthesized patterns in methodological adoption.
resultsThe integration of environmental data (envirotyping) with multiple omics layers for genotype-by-environment (G×E) prediction was identified as a major emerging frontier, though currently addressed in fewer than 20% of studies. Tree-based models such as random forest and XGBoost were the most prevalent, favored for their interpretability and robustness with small to medium-sized datasets. In contrast, deep learning approaches, while reporting high performance, were primarily applied to larger datasets and constrained by higher computational costs. Emerging hybrid models show promise, but their efficacy is highly architecture- dependent. The most consistent accuracy gains (10–15%) were observed for feature-engineering hybrids (autoencoders compressing multi-omics data followed by XGBoost). Stacking ensembles showed more variable performance (5–12% gains), while integrated hybrids like convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) delivered high accuracy for specific data structures. A recurring trend indicated that genomics with transcriptomics frequently boosted prediction for stress-related traits, while genomics with metabolomics excelled for quality traits. Tri-omics integration enhanced prediction for complex yield traits, though with marginal gains (< 5%) and substantial computational cost increases. Comparatively, ML-based approaches often outperformed classical genomic selection (GS) for low-heritability traits, while GS remained competitive for high-heritability traits. Deep learning models showed particular strength in handling population structure, reducing prediction errors by up to 20% in diverse panels. Critical gaps were identified: an overwhelming focus on point estimates of accuracy, (with fewer than 10% of studies reporting calibrated uncertainty metrics: and a relative scarcity of intrinsically interpretable model architectures that incorporates biological constraints as a core design principle.
conclusionML- driven multi-omics integration holds transformative potential but requires strategic implementation tailored to specific breeding objectives, trait architecture, and resource availability. Collective efforts to standardize data protocols, enhance model interpretability, and democratize computational tools are critical. Realizing equitable potential requires strategies to develop user-friendly platforms that extend advances to under-resourced crops. Transfer learning from data-rich species and federated data-sharing models are concrete avenues for promoting equitable innovations and enhancing global agricultural resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.