ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Genomic insights into endangerment and conservation of Euryodendron excelsum, a critically endangered plant.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStrengthening the protection of biodiversity has become a focus of attention in the field of evolutionary biology. Euryodendron excelsum H. T. Chang is a critically endangered plant with small and fragmented populations. However, the effects of gene flow, adaptive genes, environmental factors, and anthropogenic interference, all considered as significant factors affecting the survival and adaptation of endangered plants, on the adaptation of E. excelsum populations have not been fully explored.
resultsIn this study, the population genomic analysis of 70 E. excelsum individuals was conducted using restriction-site associated DNA sequencing approach. High genetic diversity (π = 0.268–0.320), moderate genetic differentiation (FST = 0.065–0.193), clear genetic structure, and accumulation of deleterious mutations were found in E. excelsum populations. Historical bottleneck events, limited gene flow, anthropogenic disturbance, and intrinsic biological characteristics have led to the formation of small and fragmented populations of E. excelsum. Soil composition, temperature, precipitation, leaf area index, and coverage of arbor layer were considered as candidate factors promoting population adaptation. Candidate genes with adaptive signals were found to be involved in functions related to binding, metabolism, stress response, cellular components, and transcriptional regulation. Furthermore, ecological niche modeling predicted that the suitable niche range of E. excelsum occurred contraction during the glacial periods and appeared range expansion in the future.
conclusionsOur research elucidates potential factors contributing to the formation of small and fragmented populations in E. excelsum, identifies candidate SNP loci associated with environmental adaptation, and projects the dynamics of its ecological niche under climate change. Based on these findings, we propose a differentiated conservation strategy, including in situ protection for genetically diverse populations (e.g., HLGW and CD) and ex situ conservation for those with high genetic load (e.g., SM and ZT), while emphasizing that genetic rescue should only follow experimental validation to mitigate outbreeding depression. Additionally, we recommend recognizing the genetically distinct QJ population as an independent conservation unit and exploring predicted suitable but unoccupied regions (e.g., Hainan, Fujian) for assisted translocation. The population genomic analysis of E. excelsum provides effective genetic resources for its conservation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.