ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Development of a machine learning-based screening model for the risk of depression among the elderly in China.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a machine learning-based screening model for the risk of depression among the elderly in China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite numerous factors being evaluated as risk factors for depression among elderly people, the precise relationship remains inconclusive, partly due to limited large-scale data that allows an advanced analysis of multiple associated factors within a single study. To fill the research gap, this study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML)-based screening model to assess the risk of depression among the elderly population and to identify health-related, psychosocial, and activities of daily living (ADL) factors deemed significant to the model.
methodsThis retrospective study extracted 11,672 records from the China Longitudinal Ageing Social Survey (CLASS). Eight supervised machine learning models—bagged tree, regularised discriminant analysis (RDA), logistic regression (LR), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost); were developed following data cleaning and data pre-processing. Feature selection analysis of predictors related to health status, psychosocial needs, and activities of daily living was conducted using a combination of normalised information gain, gain ratio, and symmetrical uncertainty. Models were trained and evaluated using cross-validation, with model selection prioritising sensitivity and F2 score for depression risk screening.
resultsAfter data cleaning and exclusion of incomplete records, 10,502 records were included in the final analysis. The bagged tree model performed best in terms of F2 score and sensitivity. The five most influential factors associated with depression among the elderly population in China included frequent use of the internet, which was associated with alleviation of depression. In contrast, higher perceived ill physical health, the perception that social changes were unfavourable to the elderly and feeling that one was socially excluded were associated with increased risk of depression. However, the frequency of radio use was inconclusive whether it alleviates or worsens the risk of depression among the elderly.
conclusionThe government may consider enhancing media use (internet), improving physical health, and promoting social involvement among older adults to mitigate the prevalence of depression and safeguard their mental health. However, the study’s findings warrant confirmation in a future longitudinal study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.