ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Intelligent Decision Support for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Machine Learning Spans From Anatomical Assessment to Dynamic Risk Modeling.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the application of machine learning (ML) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to demonstrate that, owing to the unique strengths of ML, this field outperforms conventional approaches in both preoperative assessment and postoperative prediction of TAVR. Nonetheless, TAVR is the preferred treatment option for medium- and high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, a common valvular disease, because of the associated minimally invasive nature and rapid recovery. However, challenges remain in preoperative evaluation and in predicting postoperative complications. Thus, ML technology offers innovative solutions for these challenges. This study provides an overview of current ML applications in TAVR and evaluates the associated benefits in measuring preoperative anatomical parameters and predicting postoperative complications. Indeed, the superiority of ML models for preoperative planning can be assessed by comparing ML model-derived data with measurements from senior and junior observers across various aortic root anatomical parameters. Additionally, this review discusses the challenges of applying ML in TAVR, including data acquisition, privacy protection, and model generalizability. The ongoing advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly the integration of explainable AI and federated learning, is expected to enhance the accuracy and personalization of preoperative planning and postoperative prediction for TAVR. This progress will facilitate broader application of these technologies, ultimately benefiting a wider patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.