ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Barriers to Participation and Adherence in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programmes: A Scoping Review of Recent Evidence from Industrialized and Developing Countries.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Participation and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remain low worldwide; meanwhile, differences in barriers between industrialized and developing countries have not been well synthesized. A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines to map recent evidence (2014-2025) on barriers to CR participation and adherence in industrialized and developing settings. Searches conducted in major databases identified 538 records, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria for thematic analysis. Participation in CR ranged from 12.3% to 81% in industrialized countries and from 5% to 70% in developing settings, while adherence ranged from 70.8% to 90.3% and from 20.4% to 71.3%, respectively. Reported barriers can be clustered into patient-level beliefs and perceptions, logistical and work-related constraints, comorbidities and health status, socioeconomic and demographic factors, psychological characteristics, and health-system and environmental limitations. A wide variation in CR utilization persists globally, with distinct patterns of barriers across industrialized and developing contexts. These findings highlight the need for setting-specific strategies to improve CR participation and adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.