ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
Congenital Heart Disease and Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Current Perspectives.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07707193 (Assessment of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling in Schistosomiasis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling in Schistosomiasis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the most serious complication of congenital heart disease (CHD), constituting a heterogeneous clinical entity classified within Group 1 of the Clinical Classification of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH). PAH associated with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD) affects approximately 3-10% of patients with CHD and accounts for up to one-third of all PAH cases in the adult population. This review provides an educational and up-to-date perspective on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of PAH-CHD. The updated haemodynamic definitions of the 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines (mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) ≥20 mmHg) and the importance of contemporary registries (COMPERA-CHD, HOPE) in defining prognosis are discussed. The pathophysiology is explored in depth, from initial shear stress to the imbalance in the three canonical pathways that regulate pulmonary vascular functions (endothelin, nitric oxide, prostacyclin), the role of inflammation and metabolism, and the central importance of the TGF-β/BMPR2 genetic pathway, which has led to new disease-modifying therapies. Moreover, this review addresses the crucial clinical distinction between paediatric management, constrained by limited evidence, and adult management (ACHD), with a focus on the multisystem disorder of Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) and the challenges of care transition. The gold-standard diagnostic (right heart catheterisation), the 'treat and repair' strategy in the haemodynamic 'grey zone', and the complex risk stratification in this population are also analysed. Additionally, the evidence from key trials (BREATHE-5, MAESTRO, REPLACE) and the paradigm shift towards initial combination therapy (AMBITION) are reviewed from a therapeutic perspective. Finally, the most significant advance is highlighted: Sotatercept, a vascular remodelling reversal agent (STELLAR study), concluding with a review of chronic complications and prospects in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.