ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Association of pregnancy history and unhealthy lifestyle with biological age acceleration: a large cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association of pregnancy history with biological age (BA) and BA acceleration, and to explore joint effect with lifestyle factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the UK Biobank, a population-based cohort recruited across UK between 2006 and 2010, with followed up until the end of 2022. Female participants with available data on chronological age, pregnancy history, lifestyle factors, and clinical biochemistry biomarkers were included. BA and aging acceleration were estimated using Klemera-Doubal Method (KDM BA) and PhenoAge algorithms. The KDM BA, PhenoAge, KDM BA acceleration, and PhenoAge acceleration were calculated. Multivariable general linear regression models were used to assess the associations of pregnancy history alone and combined with lifestyle with BA and BA acceleration. Results: Among 137,218 participants [mean (SD) age, 55.73 (8.01) years], 115 675 (84.3%) reported a history of pregnancy. Compared to those who had never been pregnant, women with a history of pregnancy had a decrease in BA [β = -0.312 (95% CI, -0.432 to -0.191) for KDM BA; β = -0.242 (95% CI, -0.302 to -0.183) for PhenoAge], and BA acceleration [β = -0.021 (95% CI, -0.034 to -0.009) for KDM BA acceleration; β = -0.088 (95% CI, -0.102 to -0.075) for PhenoAge acceleration]. Women with unhealthier lifestyle behaviors had higher BA and BA acceleration, regardless of pregnancy history ( Conclusions: In this large population-based study, pregnancy was associated with lower BA and BA acceleration, while an unhealthier lifestyle was associated with higher BA and BA acceleration. These findings suggest that both reproductive and lifestyle factors may play a role in developing anti-aging interventions and guiding healthy aging policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.