ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Language-games in live mindfulness-based stress reduction: a philosophy of language analysis of participant-trainer dialogue.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It is important to explore how words are given to body awareness in Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), as this impacts health and illness, while the literature on this topic is scarce. This study is the first to explore the learning process of enhancing one's body awareness live in MBSR sessions through a philosophy of language lens. It is the first known application of Wittgenstein and Austin to full-course, live MBSR dialogue, and it analyzes language-games and all three speech acts in context. This is a suitable approach, as these philosophers focus on how language is used in real-life conversations. Methods: We analyzed the full transcript of a complete MBSR training with interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results: The results indicate that verbalizing body awareness was difficult for MBSR participants. Participants talked about emotions or they made rational judgments, while they found it hard to express what bodily sensations they felt. We suggest, using Wittgenstein's concept of "language-games," that in this case study, learning to verbalize one's body awareness can be understood as learning a language-game of "reporting sense perceptions." Referring to Austin's concept, our findings also show what type of "speech acts" are done in MBSR. Discussion: The results of this study align with insights on emotion regulation therapy. The first step in these therapies is learning to feel bodily sensations instead of making rational judgments. In conclusion, we suggest that our results contribute to the scientific debate on the relation between language and body awareness. We also hypothesize the implications for the widespread use of mindfulness apps and recorded versions of the body scan, that both lack the feedback of the living trainer-participant dialogue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.