ArticleInternational journal of population data science2026
Network analysis as a tool to illustrate the population-level complex prescribing to community-dwelling people living with dementia.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prescribing for people living with dementia can be challenging. Emerging research methods present an opportunity to learn about complex patterns of medication use and leverage this understanding to optimize care. Objective: We describe network analysis, an unsupervised machine learning method, to understand population-level prescribing in older adults living with dementia. Methods: We included community-dwelling adults aged 67 and older, newly ascertained as having dementia between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2016 in Ontario, Canada. Using medication dispensation data, we created network graphs at ascertainment and five years later. Each node represented a medication subclass; subclasses concurrently dispensed to the same individual were considered linked by an edge. Atributes of networks were used to characterize prescribing across individuals: nodes, edges (including network density), and node centrality metrics. Results: We identified 99,064 individuals with incident dementia, of which 15,222 were alive and not living in a nursing home after five years. Network graphs visually demonstrated trends at the subclass level, such as a high prevalence of cardiovascular medications, and showed changes between times, such as an increase in dispensation of central nervous system active medications, particularly cholinesterase inhibitors (15.5% at index compared to 26.4% at five years). Co-dispensing (edge width) remained mostly consistent over time. Metrics derived from the networks highlighted differences, such as increased density (proportion of co-dispensed medication subclasses of all possible pairs) at five years compared to at ascertainment. Node centrality established frequently prescribed medication subclasses (statins, proton pump inhibitors, and beta blockers) as important within networks in this population. Conclusions: This study offered an introductory review of the fundamental aspects of network analysis and demonstrated the complexity of prescribing patterns in people with incident dementia at the population-level. This showed that networks analysis can be used in future studies to compare population-level prescribing patterns across patient subgroups, prescribers, settings of care and regions to identify important differences. Key points: Network graphs and associated metrics offer a novel way of summarizing complex prescribing data across populations and may allow the discovery of important medication differences over time, between patient subgroups, and across prescribers.For older adults living with dementia in the community, medication network graphs were highly connected and showed a high prevalence of cardiovascular in addition to central nervous system medications.Corresponding network graph metrics supported these findings quantitatively and showed increased density at five years compared to at ascertainment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.