ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
The AMP-antibiotic-microbiota triad in IBD: a mechanistic framework for dysregulated antimicrobial defense.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Restoring Microbial Balance: Clinical Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Pediatric Disorders.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Microbial metabolic memory in inflammatory bowel disease: microbiota-derived metabolites, host-microbe reprogramming, and relapse susceptibility.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represents a chronic relapsing disorder driven by a loss of homeostatic balance between the host immune system and the intestinal microbiota. Endogenous antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), produced primarily by epithelial and immune cells, function in concert with commensal microorganisms to preserve mucosal integrity and barrier function. Disruption of this antimicrobial equilibrium-through genetic susceptibility such as NOD2 mutations or environmental perturbations including antibiotic overuse-can impair antimicrobial defense, distort microbial composition, and initiate chronic inflammation. Recent investigations have revealed distinct alterations in AMP expression across IBD subtypes. In Crohn's disease, Paneth cell-derived α-defensins (HD5 and HD6) are markedly diminished in the ileal mucosa, whereas colonic, segmental IBD exhibits inadequate induction of β-defensins and LL-37. Conversely, in actively inflamed regions, certain AMPs such as human β-defensin-2 (HBD2) and lysozyme are strongly upregulated, reflecting a compensatory response to inflammatory cell infiltration and microbial invasion. Beyond host-derived peptides, broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure profoundly reshapes commensal communities, attenuates basal pattern-recognition receptor signaling, and secondarily perturbs AMP regulation-creating a feedback loop that amplifies dysbiosis. Here, we conceptualize these interactions as an integrated AMP-antibiotic-microbiota triad, in which endogenous antimicrobial regulation, exogenous antimicrobial pressure, and microbial ecological resilience dynamically co-determine mucosal stability. By positioning AMPs within this tripartite regulatory framework, this review delineates how antimicrobial imbalance arises across IBD subtypes, compares emerging therapeutic strategies-including AMP enhancement, microbiota-sparing antibiotic regimens, fecal microbiota transplantation, and metabolite-guided interventions-and highlights implications for precision recalibration of antimicrobial homeostasis in IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.