Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41924691›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Influence of the Postovulatory Progesterone on the Outcome of In Vitro Fertilization.

Emina Ejubovic, Miro Kasum, Emir Mahmutbegovic, Jasmin Hodzic, Emina Sacak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emina EjubovicDepartment of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Endocrinology, Sarajevo Medical School, Sarajevo School of Science and Technology, Sarajevo, BIH.
Miro KasumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, HRV.
Emir MahmutbegovicDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Endocrinology, Sarajevo Medical School, Sarajevo School of Science and Technology, Sarajevo, BIH.
Jasmin HodzicDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zenica, Zenica, BIH.
Emina SacakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Zenica Cantonal Hospital, Zenica, BIH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the influence of postovulatory progesterone (P4) on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a prospective cohort study which included 400 patients (300 in the control group and 100 in the group with elevated preovulatory P4 (preovulatory P4 > 4.77 nmol/L) - 85 normal responders and 15 high responders). The influence of postovulatory P4 on the IVF outcome has been investigated in this study.

resultsIt was found that the P4 value on the fifth cycle day at a concentration ≤425.7 nmol/L has a high sensitivity (86.21%, 95% CI 81.7-90.0%) and a low specificity (23.64%, 95% CI 16.1-32.7%) in all patients in the study. The obtained results showed that P4 values on day 5 >425,7 nmol/L in all patients, and the P4 on the 5th day >384,6 nmol/L among patients with elevated preovulatory P4 represent a threshold for the successful IVF procedure (positive ultrasound visualization of the gestational sac at six weeks of pregnancy with the presence of fetal heart action after embryo transfer).

conclusionThe P4 on the fifth day >425,7 nmol/L could be a potential marker for the success of the IVF procedures among all the patients, and with P4 on the fifth day >384,6 nmol/L among patients with elevated preovulatory P4.

Indexed as

in vitro fertilizationivfluteal supportpostovulatory progesterones: preovulatory progesterone

Identifiers

PMID41924691
PMCPMC13038238

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.