Evidence mapPaperPMID 41924697Full record

ReviewBrain communications2026

Advances in ocular motor and pupil biomarkers for neurological disorders.

Ana Coito, Dominik Brügger, Tatiana Brémovà-Ertl, Pia Massatsch, Mathias Abegg, Konrad P Weber, Anke Salmen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana CoitomachineMD, Bern 3008, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1797-5819
Dominik BrüggermachineMD, Bern 3008, Switzerland.
Tatiana Brémovà-ErtlDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Bern, Bern 3008, Switzerland.
Pia MassatschmachineMD, Bern 3008, Switzerland.
Mathias AbeggmachineMD, Bern 3008, Switzerland.
Konrad P WeberDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich 8091, Switzerland.
Anke SalmenDepartment of Neurology, St.Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurological disorders are often difficult to diagnose and monitor, particularly in the early stages when symptoms may be subtle or nonspecific. Because the visual system engages a large portion of the cerebral cortex and relies on well-defined neural pathways, it offers a unique and accessible window into brain function. In this context, the concepts of oculomics and oculometrics have gained increasing attention. Oculomics refers to the study of systemic and neurological diseases through ocular biomarkers, while oculometrics involves the computational quantification of eye and pupil parameters. Together, these approaches provide noninvasive, objective, and reproducible methods to assess neurological function, with strong potential to improve diagnostic precision, monitor disease progression, and guide individualized care. This review synthesizes recent advances in ocular motor and pupillary biomarkers in three major neurological conditions: multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and Alzheimer's disease. In multiple sclerosis, early ocular motor disturbances such as internuclear ophthalmoplegia, saccadic dysmetria, and impaired smooth pursuit are frequently observed and may reflect brainstem and cerebellar involvement. Relative afferent pupillary defect, objectively measured with pupillometry, is a strong indicator of optic neuritis. In Parkinson's disease, impaired saccadic initiation, hypometric saccades, and convergence abnormalities reflect basal ganglia dysfunction, while pupil irregularities suggest underlying autonomic imbalance. In Alzheimer's disease, impairments in saccades, smooth pursuit, fixation instability, and the pupillary light reflex have been associated with early cortical and brainstem pathology, reflecting deficits in attention, executive control, and cholinergic function. We also discuss the integration of eye-tracking data with neuroimaging and electrophysiology biomarkers to support multimodal diagnostic frameworks with the potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and disease monitoring. In addition, we highlight how recent technological developments in virtual reality-based eye-tracking could offer immersive, standardized testing conditions to enable scalable implementation of oculometric assessments in clinical practice. As the fields of oculomics and oculometrics continue to evolve, these approaches hold promise to bridge the gap between research and clinical application. However, large-scale validation studies, standardized protocols, and normative datasets are essential for broader clinical adoption. By embedding ocular motor and pupillary biomarkers into routine neurological assessments, clinicians may be able to detect disease earlier, differentiate between overlapping syndromes, and monitor therapeutic outcomes more effectively.

Indexed as

neurological disordersocular motor biomarkersoculomicspupillometryvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41924697
PMCPMC13037705

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.