ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
An explainable online frailty prediction model for community-dwelling older adults based on machine learning algorithms: a cross-sectional study based on retrospective health data.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrailty is a significant health concern associated with diminished physiological reserves and increased healthcare burdens. Currently, effective models for predicting frailty risk are lacking. This study utilizes machine learning-based models to early identify community-dwelling older adults, enhancing risk assessment accuracy and guiding targeted interventions to slow frailty progression.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis of data from 1,156 older adults across 31 community health centers in Nanjing, conducted between January and October 2024, was performed. Independent predictors of frailty were identified using univariate analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The dataset was divided into 70% training and 30% testing subsets. Six machine learning (ML) models were developed and their performances compared. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to interpret the models, and a web-based risk calculator was created.
resultsOur dataset showed that 22.3% of older adults were frail. Significant predictors of frailty were identified as age, education, medicine, vegetable, cognitive status, number of diseases, hemoglobin, total cholesterol, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Among the six ML models, Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) exhibited the highest performance, attaining an AUROC of 0.886 in the training set and 0.831 in the testing set.
conclusionsThe developed CatBoost model and web calculator can be employed by general practitioners to proactively identify high-risk community-dwelling older adults, thereby enabling timely interventions to mitigate the progression of frailty. The tool's simplicity and replicability effectively facilitate the promotion and management of frailty prevention within the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.