ArticleCurationis2026
Factors determining patient satisfaction during healthcare delivery in Limpopo, South Africa.
Article in Curationis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality. Several studies conducted revealed that there is patient dissatisfaction globally, in the sub-Saharan region and nationally. However, factors influencing patients' satisfaction during healthcare delivery remain unknown.
objectivesThe study aimed to examine the factors that influence patients' satisfaction during healthcare delivery at a selected district hospital.
methodA quantitative descriptive design was used. The questionnaire was developed using the Donabedian model for quality care to measure patient satisfaction. The tool was piloted before use. Questionnaires were distributed to 320 respondents who were randomly selected. The response rate was 100%. Data were analysed using statistical software, SAS 9.2, with descriptive statistics and the Chi-square tests.
resultsKey issues that made patients dissatisfied with healthcare facilities were poor communication, inpatient disagreement (19% as compared to 6% outpatient, p = 0.0018), long waiting time (76% of inpatients as compared to 24% of outpatient respondents, p 0.001), unclean environment (26% inpatient and 35% outpatient), dirty linen, unsafe water for drinking, and poor infrastructure.
conclusionIt is evident that many issues contribute to patient dissatisfaction in healthcare facilities, highlighting the need for improvement. Satisfied patients are more likely to return, while dissatisfied ones may neglect treatment, spread negative feedback, or pursue legal action. Such dissatisfaction can also discourage others from seeking care. Therefore, healthcare providers must regularly assess their services, identify areas for improvement, and implement changes to maintain patient satisfaction. Furthermore, recommendations were made on how to improve the healthcare facilities. Implementing the recommended strategies can greatly enhance quality care and patient satisfaction.Contribution: The findings will contribute to the development of quality improvement strategies and monitoring systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.