ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026
The accuracy of the injury severity score in patients below the age of 18 years, a trauma registry data study.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Injury Severity Score (ISS) is an anatomical score that estimates both severity of trauma and risk of mortality in adults. Although widely used, its applicability in pediatric trauma remains uncertain. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the predictive value of ISS for pediatric mortality and clinically relevant outcomes.
methodsPatients (< 18 years) treated at a level-1 trauma centre with traumatic injury between 2015 and 2023 were included in the Dutch National Trauma Registry. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to assess the discriminative performance of ISS for mortality, prehospital advanced care, emergency interventions, imaging, length of stay, surgical burden, and functional outcome.
results1733 patients were included. ISS showed excellent discrimination for mortality (AUC 0.97) and good performance for emergency interventions, prehospital advanced care, functional outcome, and admission to higher levels of care, but limited value for predicting number of surgeries. Optimal thresholds for ISS were 16 or higher, except for CT imaging (ISS ≥ 10).
conclusionISS reliably predicts mortality and several clinically relevant outcomes in children. While ISS ≥ 16 remains appropriate for identifying severe injury, optimal thresholds vary by outcome. These findings emphasize the need for outcome-specific interpretation of ISS, for benchmarking and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.