ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
ProVenTL: a transfer-learning framework for predicting peptide-protein interactions derived from snake venom for cancer therapeutics.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of peptide-protein interactions (PepPI) is crucial for advancing peptide-based anticancer drug design. In this study, we introduce ProVenTL, a computer-aided molecular design framework that leverages transfer learning and protein language model embeddings to enhance PepPI prediction accuracy and interpretability. Two complementary strategies were explored: (i) fine-tuning a CAMP model pretrained on large-scale PepPI data from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) using a curated dataset of Calloselasma rhodostoma venom peptides and cancer-related proteins, and (ii) integrating ProtT5 embeddings with stacked autoencoder-deep neural networks (SAE-DNN) and TabNet classifiers. Models were comprehensively benchmarked against baseline configurations and representative deep-learning approaches using standard classification metrics, while biological relevance was evaluated through functional enrichment and pathway analysis of top-ranked predictions. Compared with baseline configurations and conventional deep-learning approaches, the ProtT5-based SAE-DNN model achieved the best performance (accuracy = 0.78; ROC-AUC = 0.86), demonstrating improved generalization capability on a small, domain-specific venom peptide dataset. The model identified key targets such as TRBC2, CD274, HIF1AN, PCSK9, and PLAU, which are associated with pathways involved in immune suppression, hypoxia regulation, lipid metabolism, and metastasis. This study highlights the utility of transfer learning and protein language models for PepPI prediction in data-limited scenarios and establishes a computational framework for prioritizing snake-venom-derived peptides for anticancer drug discovery and future experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41925960What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.