ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2026
Efficacy and safety of Moroccan and Turkish essential oils against Varroa destructor: varroacidal potency, locomotor activity impact, and mechanistic insights via molecular docking.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor is considered as a major threat to honey bees (Apis mellifera) worldwide, contributing significantly to colony losses. Conventional synthetic acaricides are increasingly ineffective due to resistance and the harmful residues they leave in hive products. This study evaluates the varroacidal activity and safety of essential oils (EOs) extracted from Moroccan (Thymus satureioides, Thymus pallidus) and Turkish (Origanum minutiflorum, Plantago major) plants. EO compositions were characterized by GC-MS, and their varroacidal activity was assessed via in vitro fumigation bioassays. While in silico analyses (molecular docking and dynamics) were conducted to identify bioactive compounds and elucidate their mechanisms of action, effects on locomotor activity were also examined. Thymol and carvacrol were identified as key active compounds, with molecular docking showing strong binding affinities to varroa odorant-binding protein (–7.1 and − 7.0 kcal/mol, respectively), supporting their observed bioactivity. The binary combination of O. minutiflorum and T. pallidus demonstrated synergistic effects, yielding the lowest LD₅₀ (0.845 µL/L air). Toxicity predictions indicated that most EO components posed low genotoxic and irritant risks. EO treatments significantly reduced bee locomotor activity compared to controls, though no differences were found among EO types. These findings highlight the potential of specific EOs and their combinations as sustainable and selective agents for varroa control, however, significantly reduced honey bee locomotor activity has been registered, suggesting potential sedative or sublethal neurotoxic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41925973What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.