ArticleEndocrine2026
Interpretable machine learning model for immune-related hyperthyroidism prediction in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A retrospective study.
Article in Endocrine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the risk of immune-related hyperthyroidism (irHT) in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
methodsA retrospective cohort study included 711 patients who received ICIs treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets in a ratio of 7:3. This study used six ML algorithms: logistic regression (LR), deep neural network (DNN), random forest classifier (RF), support vector machine (SVM), light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) to construct irHT risk prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was the main evaluation metric. Model interpretability was achieved through Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) and Locally Interpretable Model-Independent Explanation.
resultsAmong these models, the LGBM model showed the highest predictive performance with an AUC of 0.788 (95% CI: 0.742–0.834) in the testing set. The Delong’s test and calibration curve indicated that the LGBM model performed better than the other models. SHAP analysis showed that free triiodothyronine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and hypertension were the top important risk factors.
conclusionsThe interpretable ML model established in this study may provide a useful reference for irHT risk assessment in patients receiving ICIs. Our findings may support individualized risk assessment in clinical practice and contribute to improving the safety of ICIs therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41925983What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.