ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Hair Aging Revisited: An Expert Delphi Consensus on Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Future Therapies.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHair follicle (HF) aging is a complex process involving gradual deterioration in the function and structure of the HF, adding to degenerative changes in the hair shaft caused by weathering. Despite growing research interest, hair aging remains inconsistently defined in clinical practice, with no universally accepted classification or management guidelines. This study aimed to define hair aging and achieve consensus on diagnostic and management of hair aging.
methodsA modified Delphi methodology was used. A European and USA-based scientific committee developed a structured questionnaire, which was distributed to a panel of 24 dermatologists in Europe. Each statement was rated on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as a median score of 1-3 or 7-9 with < 1/3 of responses outside this range and an interquartile range (IQR) < 4.
resultsOf the 65 statements, 51 (78.5%) reached consensus. Experts agreed that hair aging includes both quantitative and qualitative changes involving pigment loss, hair follicle miniaturization, and declining hair fiber quality. Hair graying was attributed to oxidative stress, melanocyte depletion, and diminished pigmentation-related signaling. Several contributing risk factors were identified. Senescent alopecia was defined as diffuse hair thinning in both androgen-dependent and -nondependent areas. Although diagnostic overlap with androgenetic alopecia (AGA) was acknowledged, the panel emphasized distinct underlying pathophysiology for hair aging, with stem cell exhaustion, fibrosis, and immunosenescence as suspected key mechanisms. Preventative care through lifestyle modification and supportive hair care practices was widely endorsed. Minoxidil was the only pharmacologic therapy to receive consensus support, while other emerging therapies to slow HF aging require further investigation.
conclusionsThis Delphi consensus provides a structured expert overview of hair aging, highlights areas of agreement and uncertainty, may assist in improving diagnostic accuracy and more consistent management strategies for age-related hair changes, and identifies potential new targets for therapeutic intervention. Graphical Abstract available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.