ReviewPaediatric drugs2026
GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Across Preconception, Pregnancy, and the Postpartum Periods.
Review in Paediatric drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obesity in reproductive-age women is associated with increased risk of cardiometabolic disease, infertility, and pregnancy-related complications affecting both the mother and fetus. Recently, the introduction of highly effective glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists has led to increased utilization of obesity medications in this population. While these agents are not recommended during pregnancy, their use in the preconception, periconception, and postpartum periods is increasing. Yet, data on their safety and clinical utility during these reproductive windows remain limited. This review summarizes the current literature on the risks and benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonist use for both the mother and fetus, highlighting the need for ongoing high-quality research in this population. This review highlights key clinical considerations across reproductive stages, emphasizes the primacy of human exposure data where available, and identifies critical evidence gaps requiring future prospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41926051What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.