Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926439›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2026

Drivers of psychological distress among first year female public university students in South Africa: A qualitative exploratory study.

Mercilene Tanyaradzwa Machisa, Pinky Mahlangu, Yandisa Sikweyiya, Rachel Jewkes, Elizabeth Dartnall, Sinegugu Duma, Nelisiwe Khuzwayo, Managa Pillay, Millicent Maoto, Carrie Brooke-Sumner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mercilene Tanyaradzwa Machisa. Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7275-1100
Pinky Mahlangu. Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Yandisa Sikweyiya. Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Rachel Jewkes. Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Elizabeth DartnallSexual Violence Research Initiative, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-8741
Sinegugu DumaSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2489-8770
Nelisiwe KhuzwayoSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Managa PillayOprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls, Meyerton, Gauteng, South Africa.
Millicent Maoto. Gender and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa.
Carrie Brooke-SumnerSchool of Nursing and Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Howard College Campus, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing literature, primarily from high-income countries, highlights the first year of higher education as a challenging period for students. Academic demands, family expectations, social pressures, and relational difficulties are commonly associated with increased psychological distress during this time. In South Africa, research is mostly quantitative, lacking qualitative insights into the nuanced drivers of distress among first-year students, particularly young, female, and Black-African students. We aimed to explore drivers of psychological distress among Black-African first-year female students in South African universities and examine how they collectively influenced their mental health challenges. Fifty-four Black-African, female students aged 18-30years enrolled at three South African university campuses participated in three focus group discussions led by female researchers. The FGDs explored first-year students' drivers and experiences of psychological distress while navigating the transition to university and their considerations around utilizing support services. We found that individual, peer, family, relationship, and institutional factors collectively contributed to psychological distress among students. Academic challenges including increased workloads and unfamiliar study methods, combined with struggle to secure residences, and social pressures to conform to peer lifestyles, exacerbated their distress. Financial distress, often intensified by delayed funding and family obligations like "black tax", forced difficult choices and prioritisations. Additionally, controlling and emotionally abusive relationships, alongside partner infidelity, further undermined the students' well-being. These interconnected stressors negatively impacted psychological distress which was aggravated by limited access to support services during the critical university transition. Findings suggest that first-year Black-African female students, especially those from low-income households, often experience psychological distress from intersecting academic, social, financial, and relational challenges. To improve wellbeing and academic success, universities must prioritise removing barriers to comprehensive support for first year students. Key actions include ensuring timely financial aid, expanding access to mental health services, academic orientation programmes, and implement initiatives that promote mental health, women's empowerment and healthy relationships.

Identifiers

PMID41926439
PMCPMC13046107

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.