Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41926449›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Advances in vaccine development through the controlled human infection models for hookworm and schistosomiasis.

Marie-Astrid Hoogerwerf, Moses Egesa, Selidgji Todagbe Agnandji, Alex Loukas, Meta Roestenberg

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marie-Astrid HoogerwerfLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-3380
Moses EgesaVaccine Research Theme, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Selidgji Todagbe AgnandjiCentre de Recherches Médicales de Lambaréné, Lambaréné, Gabon.
Alex LoukasAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Meta RoestenbergLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlled human infection models can play an important role in vaccine development, particularly for neglected tropical diseases such as helminth infections. Currently, controlled infection models have been established for schistosomiasis and hookworm. This review highlights the developments in the controlled human schistosomiasis infection model (CHI-S) and the controlled human hookworm infection model (CHHI) and their contributions to vaccine development. In general, both models are considered safe and well-tolerated. Measures to decrease risk of potential adverse events were taken when developing the models. For both models, production of challenge agents follows the principles of Good Manufacturing Practice. Both models have proven to reliably detect infection and can be used to assess efficacy of immunization strategies. While hookworms and schistosomes are both helminths, the controlled human infection (CHI)-studies have also highlighted differences between these pathogens. Notably, schistosomiasis seems to induce more, dose-dependent, systemic symptoms, whereas in hookworm models skin symptoms are much more prominent. Infection levels for schistosomiasis are therefore limited and lower than those usually seen in endemic populations, whereas for hookworm it is possible to reach levels comparable to mild-moderate intensity infection in the field. Host responses to short-term infection were also different: short-term schistosome infection induced immune-tolerance, whereas short-term infection with hookworm larvae seems to induce a more pro-inflammatory response compared to that seen in the adult worms. Most studies have been performed in naïve non-endemic populations, however, currently the models are being expanded to endemic areas. This has raised new questions around the impact of non-native strains of parasites or vectors to the endemic parasite strains and the environment. Studies in endemic areas, however, will significantly contribute towards understanding the immunology of these helminth infections in pre-exposed individuals. In general, the success of these established models is encouraging to the further development of controlled human helminth infection models.

Indexed as

AncylostomatoideaHookworm InfectionsSchistosomiasisVaccine DevelopmentVaccinesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHuman Challenge Trials as TopicHumansSchistosomaVaccines

Identifiers

PMID41926449
PMCPMC13046170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.