ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2026
Transition from Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion to IDeg-Based Regimens in Hospitalized T2DM Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often initiate insulin therapy in the hospital, requiring rapid glycemic control and simplified post-discharge plans. Few clinical studies have focused on the transition protocols for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of transitioning from CSII to three treatment regimens: insulin degludec (IDeg), insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp), or insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira). Methods: Clinical information and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data were retrospectively collected from 171 patients in a single center. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were assessed using standardized questionnaires in a three-month follow-up. Results: After transition, mean glucose (MG) and glucose management indicator (GMI) decreased, while time in range (TIR) increased significantly. Coefficient of variation (CV) and time above range (TAR) decreased. Time below range (TBR) was unchanged in IDegAsp and IDegLira groups but slightly increased in the IDeg group (0.60% [0.00%, 1.60%] vs 1.10% [0.00%, 3.40%], Conclusion: All three regimens enabled a smooth transition after CSII therapy. IDegAsp and IDegLira demonstrated superior glycemic control and reduced variability compared to IDeg. IDegLira was more convenient and associated with higher patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.