ArticleBMJ open2026
Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEarly screening of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is critical for early diagnosis and management. The disease was renamed and its diagnostic criteria revised as metabolic-associated FLD (MAFLD) in 2020 and further updated to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in 2023. This study evaluated the predictive performance and clinical feasibility of non-invasive diagnostic indicators across the NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD diagnostic criteria.
designCross-sectional study.
settingHealth Management Centre in China.
participantsA total of 5810 participants aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Individuals with missing laboratory data, imaging results or self-reported information were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease-specific indicators included Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Hepatic Steatosis Index and Zhejiang University index (ZJU). Non-disease-specific indicators included lipid accumulation product (LAP), Visceral Adiposity Index and the Triglyceride and Glucose Index. Subgroup analysis was performed by gender and Body Mass Index (BMI).
resultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all six non-invasive indicators exceeded 0.7. FLI showed the optimal predictive performance across the three criteria (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.802, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.847 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.811), with comparable performance observed for ZJU (0.797, 0.838 and 0.809, respectively). Pairwise z-tests demonstrated a significant difference between FLI and ZJU for MAFLD (p<0.05), but not for NAFLD or MASLD (all p>0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that ZJU performed better in males (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.790, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.839 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.803), while FLI was superior in females (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.832, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.838 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.838) and in participants who were overweight (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.709, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.765 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.709). LAP exhibited the highest predictive efficacy in the normal BMI subgroup (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.758, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.804 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.796).
conclusionsFLI exhibited the highest predictive efficacy across all diagnostic criteria, and ZJU showed comparable performance. Considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical practicality, ZJU is recommended as a favourable, non-invasive tool for population-based screening in the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.