ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimized K-means algorithm for image segmentation based on improved dung beetle algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To improve the quality and computational efficiency of image segmentation, and to overcome the limitations of the traditional K-means algorithm-such as sensitivity to initial cluster centers and susceptibility to local optima-this study proposes an Improved Dung Beetle Optimization (IDBO) algorithm and its application to K-means-based image segmentation. First, Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) is employed to initialize the population, enhancing diversity and uniformity in the search space and preventing premature convergence in early iterations. Second, a hybrid position updating strategy, combining a nonlinear decision factor with a competition mechanism, dynamically balances global exploration and local exploitation, improving adaptability across different search stages. Third, the Cauchy inverse cumulative distribution operator and tangent flight operator are integrated to perform dynamic perturbation and fine-tuning on optimal individuals, strengthening local exploitation and enhancing the ability to escape local optima. Comprehensive experiments on standard benchmark functions demonstrate that IDBO outperforms the original DBO and other comparative algorithms in convergence speed, optimization accuracy, and stability. The algorithm is further applied to optimize K-means clustering for image segmentation. Quantitative metrics, including Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), confirm that IDBO-based segmentation achieves higher accuracy, better edge preservation, and improved texture fidelity. Additionally, an ablation study isolates the contributions of each enhancement strategy, demonstrating their complementary effects and validating the superiority of the integrated IDBO framework. These results highlight the potential of combining intelligent optimization and clustering algorithms to develop adaptive, high-performance image segmentation techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.