ArticleScientific reports2026
Development of a web platform for predicting fall risk in cardiovascular patients using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning-based fall risk prediction model for middle-aged and elderly individuals with cardiovascular disease. Data were sourced from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Key predictive variables were identified using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression. Six machine learning algorithms were employed to construct predictive models. Model performance was assessed through both internal and external validation, with SHapley Additive exPlanation values used to interpret the optimal model. A total of 1784 participants were analyzed, of which 434 (24.3%) experienced falls during a two-year follow-up period. Nine predictive factors were incorporated into the model, with the Light Gradient Boosting Machine model demonstrating the best performance, achieving areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.839 (95% CI 0.804-0.874) for internal validation and 0.816 (95% CI 0.798-0.833) for external validation. This model provides a scientific basis for personalized fall prevention strategies aimed at reducing fall incidence and enhancing the quality of life for patients with cardiovascular disease. Finally, we formed a web platform based on the best model to predict the probability of falls in cardiovascular patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.