Evidence mapPaperPMID 41927621Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development and external validation of a predictive model for in-hospital mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis and sepsis.

Yanyu Hu, Linzhu Zhang, Jiangning Yin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yanyu HuNanjing Jiangning Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu, China.
Linzhu ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, Jiangsu, China.
Jiangning YinNanjing Jiangning Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu, China. jsyinjn@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cirrhosis has an increasing prevalence globally, and sepsis is a common life-threatening comorbidity of cirrhosis. The cirrhotic population benefits less from the diagnostic decision-making in current guidelines for sepsis. To establish a predictive model and validate its efficiency for predicting the risk of all-cause in-hospital mortality (IHM) in cirrhosis with sepsis. We extracted data of cirrhosis patients with sepsis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). The MIMIC-IV dataset was assigned at 7:3 to a training set (n = 1701) and an internal validation set (n = 729), and the eICU-CRD dataset as an external validation set (n = 352). Statistically, variables were screened by LASSO regression. We assessed the model performance by ROC, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. Finally, we compared the nomogram with the SAPS-II score and conducted DeLong tests. The model achieved AUCs of 0.783 (95% CI 0.761–0.804), 0.763 (95% CI 0.729–0.796), and 0.745 (95% CI 0.692–0.797) in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Calibration curves showed good agreement. Decision curve analysis demonstrated favorable clinical utility. The nomogram is valuable in early identifying high-risk groups, implementing targeted interventions, reducing IHM, and ameliorating prognosis.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityLiver CirrhosisSepsisAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsPrognosisROC CurveCirrhosisMIMIC-IVNomogramSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41927621
PMCPMC13194707

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.