Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41927639›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A novel approach for disease and pests detection in potato production system based on deep learning.

Ahmed Abbas, Saif Ur Rehman, Khalid Mahmood, Santos Gracia Villar, Luis Alonso Dzul Lopez, Aseel Smerat, Imran Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ahmed AbbasPMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Saif Ur RehmanPMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. saif@uaar.edu.pk.
Khalid MahmoodInstitute of Computing and Information Technology, Gomal University, D.I.Khan, Pakistan.
Santos Gracia VillarUniversidad Europea del Atl ntico., Isabel Torres 21, Santander, 39011, Spain.
Luis Alonso Dzul LopezUniversidad Europea del Atl ntico., Isabel Torres 21, Santander, 39011, Spain.
Aseel SmeratFaculty of Educational Sciences, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, 19328, Jordan.
Imran AshrafDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, Republic of Korea. imranashraf92@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulnerability of potato crops to diseases and pest infestation can affect its quality and lead to significant yield losses. Timely detection of such diseases can help take effective decisions. For this purpose, a deep learning-based object detection framework is designed in this study to identify and classify major potato diseases and pests under real-world field conditions. A total of 2,688 field images were collected from two research farms in Punjab, Pakistan, across multiple growth stages in various seasonal conditions. Excluding 285 symptoms-free images from the earliest collection led to 2,403 images which were annotated into four biotic-stress classes: blight disease (n = 630), leaf spot disease (n = 370), leafroll virus (viral symptom complex; n = 888), and Colorado potato beetle (larvae/adults; n = 515), indicating class imbalance. Several state-of-the-art models were used including YOLOv8 variants (n/s/m), YOLOv7, YOLOv5, and Faster R-CNN, and the results are discussed in relation to recent potato disease classification studies involving cropped leaf images. Stratified splitting (70% training, 20% validation, 10% testing) was applied to preserve class distribution across all subsets. YOLOv8-medium achieve the best performance with mean average precision (mAP)@0.5 of 98% on the held-out test images. Results for stable 5-fold cross-validation show a mean mAP@0.5 of 97.8%, which offers a balance between accuracy and inference time. Model robustness was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation and repeated training with different random seeds, showing a low variance of ±0.4% mAP. Results demonstrate promising outcomes under the real-world field conditions, while, broader cross-region and cross-season validation is intended for the future.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPlant DiseasesSolanum tuberosumAnimalsColeopteraDetection AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedConvolutional neural networkdeep learningDisease detectionObject classificationObject detectionPests detection

Identifiers

PMID41927639
PMCPMC13187158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.