ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning based prediction of platelet concentration from ROTEM measurements.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viscoelastic testing is an established standard in modern coagulation medicine, reducing transfusion needs. However, it does not provide direct information on platelet count. Here, we present a machine learning approach to predict platelet count and to detect low platelet count based on standard rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) parameters. We analyzed 2,333 anonymised datasets collected from multiple centres between 2014 and 2023. Six machine learning methods (Regression, Gradient Boosting Methods, extreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forests, Neural Networks, and Stacked Ensemble Learning) were trained to predict platelet count and to classify thrombocytopenia below thresholds of <100 x109/L and <50 x109/L. Mean absolute error and root mean square error judged model quality for regression models; area under the curve, balanced accuracy, and F1-score for classification models. The best model for predicting platelet count was stacked ensemble learning (RMSE 57.8 ±9.1; R2 0.68 ±0.1). The best classification models were random forest classification for a platelet count below 100 x109/L (AUC 0.90 ±0.03) and stacked ensemble learning for a platelet count below 50 x109/L (AUC 0.95 ±0.03). Machine learning methods showed excellent discriminative performance for detecting low platelet count whereas only moderate predictive accuracy for predicting platelet level. This novel approach may contribute to rule-out thrombocytopenia and ensure safe and timely platelet transfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.