Trial reportScientific reports2026
Goal setting as a facilitator of motor learning in postural control task.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explored the combined effects of specific goal setting and augmented feedback on motor learning and intrinsic motivation in a postural control task. A sex-stratified, randomized, and non-blinded study was conducted among 34 healthy young adults assigned to a goal-setting or a control group. Participants performed a postural control task using an unstable board. The goal-setting group received performance goal values prior to each trial and feedback after each trial, whereas the control group received feedback only. Balance performance was measured using an overall stability index, and intrinsic motivation was assessed using the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. The experiment included a pretest, practice session, and retention test conducted 24 h later. The goal-setting group outperformed the control group in the practice session and retention test. Significant improvements were observed in interest/enjoyment and perceived competence but not in effort/importance. The results suggest that combining specific, challenging, yet attainable goals with performance feedback enhances motor performance and facilitates motor learning and intrinsic motivation. The results provide practical and clinical implications for designing practice protocols aimed at motor-skill acquisition in sports and rehabilitation contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.