ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhancing lung diseases recognition through CNN-RNN methodologies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostics of respiratory disorders greatly benefit from medical imaging, especially X-ray imaging, which offers important information about the anatomical anomalies of the lungs. As we delve deeper into the field of lung illness recognition, it becomes clear that utilizing multiscale Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) techniques has the potential to transform the detection of pneumonia and tuberculosis from X-ray images. In this paper, we will classify images through a process that requires only chest X-ray images. We have proposed a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm for lung disease detection, which we term the Convolutional Recurrent Network (C-RNet). In our research, we classify CXR images into four categories according to the publicly available dataset. Our proposed model can calculate the dependency and continuity properties of the intermediate layer output very precisely. At the same time, the features of these intermediate layers can be combined with the final fully-connected network for classification prediction, resulting in better classification accuracy. We have explored the potential of combining CNN and RNN with XAI to identify lung diseases from chest radiographs to improve diagnostic accuracy compared to traditional single-scale methods. Upon comparing our suggested model with the current models, we discovered that, with an accuracy of 93.73%, F1-score of 94.6%, total floating point operation per second (FLOPS) count of 637,222,592, total parameter count of 1,901,764 and model size of 7.25MB on the full dataset, our suggested model achieved the best accuracy of all the architectures we compared. Moreover, our suggested model, C-RNet, was observed to accurately categorize and detect the regions of disease through approaches such as Grad-CAM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.