ReviewCommunications chemistry2026
Redox chemistry of early Earth and the origin of life.
Review in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Various inorganic phosphorus species in prebiotic Earth and extraterrestrial settings.Discover chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple controversial scenarios have been proposed explaining the emergence of life, both from environmental and chemical perspectives. These scenarios discuss environmental settings including deep-ocean hydrothermal vents, volcanic lakes, hot springs, and geysers, which could have served as the cradle for life. Environmental conditions varied by energy, chemical elements, minerals, transition metals, dynamic light-dark, hot-cold, and wet-dry cycles for the first organic synthesis. Other controversies concern the type of organisms that could have appeared first: either heterotrophic or autotrophic. The heterotrophic theory suggests that the first organic compounds were abiotically synthesized from simple inorganic molecules accumulating in the oceans and concentrating in coacervates, which functioned as early pre-cellular structures. The chemoautotrophic theory argues that life originated from inorganic compounds, rather than from organic matter establishing proto-metabolic pathways in primary producers. All of the above-mentioned theories rely on redox reactions that created necessary conditions and molecules for the origin of life. This review explores evidences that reconcile the dominant theories, including that: (i) the Hadean atmosphere was weakly oxidizing, but transiently reducing, (ii) hydrothermal systems provided energy for organic synthesis supporting both heterotrophs and chemoautotrophs, (iii) organic compounds were transported between different environments, and (iv) life emerged in multiple local environments.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.