Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41927892›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2026

The expanding role of formulations to enable oral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs.

Keisuke Ueda, Christopher J H Porter, Aaron Goodwin, Lynne S Taylor

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Keisuke UedaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-4323
Christopher J H PorterDrug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3474-7551
Aaron GoodwinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, OnKure Therapeutics, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1209-9129
Lynne S TaylorIndustrial and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. lstaylor@purdue.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4568-6021

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary small-molecule drug candidates increasingly have limited aqueous solubility, rendering oral delivery challenging. Amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs) and lipid-based formulations (LBFs) have evolved as leading formulation approaches to mitigate solubility and dissolution rate limitations. There is an increasing trend towards ASD formulations for drug candidates with high melting points and LBFs for extremely lipophilic molecules. Mechanistic assessment of LBF and ASD enhancement pathways reveals a surprising amount of commonality, notably that supersaturation generation and maintenance are likely key to obtaining optimized in vivo performance for both formulation types. An expanding formulation design space is blurring the distinction between these solubility enhancement technologies and further evolution in this direction is likely necessary to address the oral delivery of even more challenging molecules, such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras and macrocyclic peptides.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsWaterAdministration, OralAnimalsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CompoundingHumansLipidsPharmaceutical PreparationsSolubilityLipidsPharmaceutical PreparationsWater

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.