Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928229›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2026

Experiences of clinicians engaged in report-back of individual chemical exposures in two pregnancy cohorts.

Alina M McIntyre, Katherine Franz, Cecilia Powderly, Nobel Hernández Otero, Katherine E Boronow, Julia Green Brody, Phil Brown, Carmen Milagros Vélez Vega, Tamarra James-Todd, Marlee R Quinn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alina M McIntyreSilent Spring Institute, Northeastern University, 320 Nevada St #302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA. mcintyre@silentspring.org.
Katherine FranzSilent Spring Institute, Northeastern University, 320 Nevada St #302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA.
Cecilia PowderlyDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Department of Public Health and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Nobel Hernández OteroUPR Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico Graduate School of Public Health, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Katherine E BoronowSilent Spring Institute, Northeastern University, 320 Nevada St #302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA.
Julia Green BrodySilent Spring Institute, Northeastern University, 320 Nevada St #302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA.
Phil BrownDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Department of Public Health and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Carmen Milagros Vélez VegaUPR Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico Graduate School of Public Health, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Tamarra James-ToddDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Marlee R QuinnDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer Liss OhayonSilent Spring Institute, Northeastern University, 320 Nevada St #302, Newton, MA, 02460, USA.

Funding

Research Experiences and Training Coordination CoreP42ES017198 · NIEHS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI HARRIS, SEAN M · 2010 to 2024
$38.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES017198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reporting individualized chemical exposure results increases environmental health literacy, empowers study participants to reduce harmful exposures, and supports researchers in identifying and addressing exposure sources. Despite recommendations to increase clinicians’ roles in environmental health promotion, clinician-involvement in environmental health report-back remains limited. This study investigates clinician-facilitated environmental health report-back as a promising approach to results dissemination. We partnered with two pregnancy cohort studies to implement report-back of individual chemical results delivered by clinicians. Nine clinicians provided individualized exposure results to 87 participants across the two cohort studies. Following report-back sessions, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician experiences, perceived facilitators and barriers to report-back, and shifts in environmental health knowledge. Clinician-facilitated report-back was described as a rewarding process that enhanced clinicians’ ability to not only guide study participants through their individual chemical results but also expand their ability to provide environmental health information to other patients. Clinicians reported increased environmental health knowledge and adoption of personal exposure reduction habits. Clinicians from both cohorts discussed the challenge of communicating scientific uncertainty surrounding specific chemical exposures and related health outcomes. To address this, clinicians relied on structured training and materials developed by the study team to provide practical and actionable exposure reduction recommendations. Expanding training opportunities, embedding environmental health information into medical curricula and clinical practice, and developing guidance for clinician participation could advance communication of environmental exposure results.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureEnvironmental HealthCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyReturn of Individual Research ResultsCliniciansEndocrine Disrupting ChemicalsEnvironmental Health KnowledgeReport-back

Identifiers

PMID41928229
PMCPMC13169688

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.