ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2026
Exploration of utilizing electronic health databases in evidence-based practice among Iranian pharmacists: a survey by simulation of health-seeking pregnant women.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based medicine (EBM) applies the most reliable evidence available to support clinical decision-making, improving treatment outcomes, rational medication use, and reducing healthcare costs.
objectivesThis study evaluated the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of Iranian community pharmacists regarding EBM utilization.
methodsA 36-item questionnaire was designed and validated to assess the pharmacists’ knowledge and attitudes toward EBM. Practice was evaluated using a simulated-patient method one week after questionnaire completion. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine associations between pharmacist characteristics and knowledge and practice scores, with sensitivity analyses adjusting for geographic region.
resultsWithin 284 pharmacy visits, data were obtained from 200 pharmacists aged 24–65 years. The average knowledge score was 37.91 ± 15.4 (out of 100). Pharmacists aged 24–29 demonstrated higher knowledge levels than those aged 30–65 (P = 0.042). Dispensing more than 30 prescriptions daily was associated with higher knowledge scores (P = 0.024). Pharmacists who reported using UpToDate® demonstrated higher knowledge and practice scores compared with non-users (P < 0.001). Attitudes toward EBM were overwhelmingly positive, indicating strong theoretical support despite reported implementation barriers. The mean practice score in managing the simulated-patient was 50.34 ± 21.35. A direct association was detected between knowledge and practice (r = 0.73, P < 0.05), whereas no association was observed between attitudes and practice. Multivariable analysis showed that younger age, higher prescription volume, and use of UpToDate® were independently associated with higher knowledge and practice scores.
conclusionMost pharmacists support EBM; however gaps in knowledge and practice remain. Use of structured electronic resources such as UpToDate® were associated with improved knowledge and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.