ReviewInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Complications of silicone oil in vitreoretinal surgery: a narrative review of clinical and experimental evidence.
Review in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our purpose was to review the existing literature on the clinical and immunopathologic adverse effects of silicone oil (SO). A review was performed of studies published from 1993 to October 2025 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library. Heavy SO agents were excluded. For silicone oil-related visual loss (SORVL), only rhegmatogenous retinal detachment studies reporting macular status were included. The review is organized into subthemes, including SORVL, emulsification, SO-related corneal and lens changes, retinal layer abnormalities, vascular changes, glaucoma, electrolyte balance, globe deposits, and optic neuropathy. Currently, there is no consensus explanation for SORVL, either due to the different surgical methodologies, the complexity of cases, or the lack of routine multimodal testing. SORVL was frequently associated with inner macular thinning, papillomacular bundle damage, and reduced macular vessel density. Emulsification and globe deposits have been described as a possible cause for the irreversible nature of some adverse effects. Longer SO duration was frequently, but not always, related to structural ocular changes. Finally, cytokine and electrolyte profiles provide evidence of inflammatory and potentially toxic mechanisms. In this review, we compiled the most recent evidence on the structural and functional complications associated with SO (such as macular thinning, SORVL, and optic neuropathy). We then summarized the pathophysiological mechanisms that may lead to these complications, including inflammation, phototoxicity, emulsification, and globe deposits. Standardized definitions (particularly for SORVL and SO-related ocular hypertension), multimodal monitoring protocols, and consensus on safe tamponade duration are still lacking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.