ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Value Analysis of MRI Habitat Analysis Combined Model in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumors.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the clinical diagnostic performance of a combined classification model incorporating magnetic resonance imaging (T1WI-CE) habitat and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) for differentiating borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (MEOTs).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 127 patients with pathologically confirmed ovarian tumors, including 62 with BOTs and 65 with MEOTs, all of whom underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examination. Twenty habitat features, including the original images, were extracted. T1WI-CE was used to extract 2395 radiomics features from two habitat subregions. Feature selection was performed using correlation analysis and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression.ResultsThe combined classification model had the highest area under the curve, 0.941 in the training group and 0.880 in the test group, thus outperforming the habitat area and clinical data classification model. The DeLong test demonstrated statistically significant differences between the combined classification model and the clinical classification model, with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.