SynthesisAmerican journal of men's health
The Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in American journal of men's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and key clinical parameters of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), prostate volume (PV), and the prevalence of MetS among men with BPH. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to March 31, 2025, with the search implementation completed on April 5, 2025 for all databases. Observational studies comparing BPH patients with and without MetS were included. Random-effects models were used to pool standardized mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs), and prevalence estimates. Heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression were performed according to prespecified criteria. Ten studies involving 3,947 BPH patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses demonstrated that MetS was associated with larger prostate volume (PV) and a tendency toward higher IPSS, although the latter showed substantial variability across studies. The prevalence of MetS among BPH patients was high, with considerable geographic and temporal variation. Subgroup analyses indicated that sample size influenced effect estimates, and meta-regression identified age, sample size, and publication year as contributors to heterogeneity. MetS is closely associated with prostate enlargement and symptom burden in men with BPH. These findings highlight the metabolic-urological interplay and support the integration of metabolic assessment into BPH management strategies. Large-scale prospective studies are needed to clarify causality and evaluate whether metabolic interventions can alter BPH progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.