ReviewChronic respiratory disease
Digital exclusion faced by people living with chronic respiratory disease: Challenges, implications and solutions.
Review in Chronic respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The introduction of digital health technologies (DHTs) to support the diagnosis, assessment, and management of chronic respiratory diseases (CRD) has great potential to democratise access to healthcare, but will suffer if these new technologies cannot be fully utilised by the patients most at need, particularly those from underserved communities. This narrative review addresses the challenges and potential solutions for reducing digital exclusion for people living with CRD. Although sparse, the available evidence suggests that digital exclusion leads to poorer health outcomes in people living with CRD. The barriers that lead to digital exclusion intersect at many different levels and include socioeconomic, demographic, geographical, digital literacy, design/accessibility and psychosocial factors. Solutions to mitigate digital exclusion in people with CRD need to operate at multiple scales with cross-sectoral collaboration, and range from ensuring access to digital tools via large national mobile/broadband infrastructure developments to ensuring DHTs for patient use are designed inclusively and frontline healthcare staff are trained to help patients engage with the tools. Currently, there is a real risk that deploying digital health interventions for CRD care may widen the digital divide and deepen health inequities. To deliver on the digital health promise, all relevant stakeholders need to be focussed on ensuring that the presence of digital exclusion is well monitored and underserved communities such as CRDs are not systematically excluded from implementation and evaluation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.