ArticleResearch square2026
Analyzing Co-expression Networks with Network Skeleton Extraction.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A central question in systems biology is to infer how genes work together to perform a specific function. While publicly available gene regulatory networks are commonly used to analyze experimental data, these networks may contain inaccuracies or inconsistencies across databases, especially for less well-studied organisms or systems where regulatory networks change over time. Data-driven network reconstruction from co-expression data is an appealing alternative, but requires sparsification to yield biologically representative networks. Threshold-based sparsification can lead to an excessively fragmented network, masking the relationship between genes and neglecting the "strength of weak ties", wherein a critical but weak relationship may serve as a vital link between two subnetworks. Results: Here we present Network Skeleton Extraction (NSE), a co-expression network generation method using spectral sparsification to sparsify co-expression statistics into minimal co-expression graphs. Spectral sparsification has the advantage of maintaining connections among genes in a manner that preserves the coarse-grained structure of the input graph. In our method, the degree of sparsification is optimized by predicting each gene's expression as a function of its connected genes at each sparsification level. This yields networks that are maximally sparse while still being predictive of gene expression. A probabilistic model also provides a null distribution of networks with similar spectral properties against which inferred networks can be compared. We illustrate the method by applying it to Xenopus transcriptome data from four cell types and six developmental stages to obtain networks specific to the organism, cell type, and developmental stage. Conclusions: By applying NSE to pre-defined gene sets in a phenotype-conditional manner, we can identify pathways whose coordination differs significantly across cell types and developmental stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.