ArticleResearch square2026
'Amazing and Daunting': Providers' Perspectives on the Implementation of Neurofeedback.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurofeedback has been used to help treat a wide variety of mental health issues. Despite studies documenting its clinical effectiveness, there is a significant gap in the literature on the determinants of neurofeedback's use in mental healthcare practice. This study sought to fill this gap by utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore providers' (n=20) perspectives on the implementation of neurofeedback via semi-structured one-to-one interviews. The qualitative analysis utilized grounded theory techniques to create an inductive codebook to reflect the implementation process and barriers and facilitators of implementation. The results aligned with the five domains of the CFIR. The most cited constructs were the complexity/steep learning curve, cost, and success providers have experienced with neurofeedback. These exploratory findings reveal implementation facilitators and barriers and a starting point for many different research questions exploring possible strategies to increase uptake of neurofeedback in routine mental healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.