Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41928895›Full record

ReviewMed-X2026

Bioinspired bioadhesion: translating nature's adhesive strategies into regenerative medicine.

Sushila Maharjan, Jacqueline Jialu He, David Hyram Hernández Medina, Bibhor Singh, Fabiola Chapa, Tsandni Wasram Jetha-Jamal, Yu Shrike Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Med-X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sushila MaharjanDivision of Engineering of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
Jacqueline Jialu HeDivision of Engineering of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
David Hyram Hernández MedinaDivision of Engineering of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
Bibhor SinghBelmont Middle School, Belmont, MA 02478 USA.
Fabiola ChapaDivision of Engineering of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
Tsandni Wasram Jetha-JamalDivision of Engineering of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
Yu Shrike ZhangDivision of Engineering of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-0808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nature, many organisms, such as mussels, geckos, tree frogs, octopuses, and salamanders, have evolved remarkable bioadhesion strategies, that enable them to attach to wet environments, climb vertical or inverted surfaces, and capture preys. These strategies rely on chemical interactions mediated by secreted bioadhesives as well as physical forces, including but not limited to friction, van der Waals interactions, capillary forces, and vacuum suction, arising from specialized micro- and nanostructures. Chemical bioadhesives, composed of proteins, polysaccharides, or other macromolecules, facilitate strong, reversible or irreversible adhesion to wet or dynamic surfaces, as exemplified by mussel byssal threads and tree frog toe pad mucus. These adhesives act through mechanisms such as covalent bonding, metal coordination, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic interactions. This review outlines recent advances in both chemical and physical bioadhesion strategies. We examine the adhesion principles used by mussels, geckos, tree frogs, octopuses, and other organisms that secrete adhesive chemicals, emphasizing the roles of micro- and nanostructures, interfacial forces, and soft contact mechanics. We also present design strategies for creating artificial adhesives inspired by these biological systems and describe their applications in regenerative medicine. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future directions in bioinspired and chemically based adhesion. Graphical Abstract:

Indexed as

BioadhesiveBioinspiredBiomaterialsHydrogelsRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID41928895
PMCPMC13038662

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.