ReviewMed-X2026
Bioinspired bioadhesion: translating nature's adhesive strategies into regenerative medicine.
Review in Med-X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In nature, many organisms, such as mussels, geckos, tree frogs, octopuses, and salamanders, have evolved remarkable bioadhesion strategies, that enable them to attach to wet environments, climb vertical or inverted surfaces, and capture preys. These strategies rely on chemical interactions mediated by secreted bioadhesives as well as physical forces, including but not limited to friction, van der Waals interactions, capillary forces, and vacuum suction, arising from specialized micro- and nanostructures. Chemical bioadhesives, composed of proteins, polysaccharides, or other macromolecules, facilitate strong, reversible or irreversible adhesion to wet or dynamic surfaces, as exemplified by mussel byssal threads and tree frog toe pad mucus. These adhesives act through mechanisms such as covalent bonding, metal coordination, hydrogen bonding, and electrostatic interactions. This review outlines recent advances in both chemical and physical bioadhesion strategies. We examine the adhesion principles used by mussels, geckos, tree frogs, octopuses, and other organisms that secrete adhesive chemicals, emphasizing the roles of micro- and nanostructures, interfacial forces, and soft contact mechanics. We also present design strategies for creating artificial adhesives inspired by these biological systems and describe their applications in regenerative medicine. Finally, we discuss current challenges and future directions in bioinspired and chemically based adhesion. Graphical Abstract:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.