ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026
Designing and immuno-informatics evaluation of a multi-epitope vaccine targeting lipoprotein A-4'-phosphatase (LpxF) for
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The WHO has classified Methods: A subtractive proteomics pipeline was employed to identify appropriate antigenic proteins for the development of a multi-epitope vaccine (MEV). Lipid A-4'phosphatase (LpxF) was selected as a potential target. Various bioinformatics and immunoinformatics databases were used to predict T and B cell epitopes. A 757 amino acid MEV was then constructed by combining eight cytotoxic T cell (CTL), nineteen helper T cell (HTL), and fourteen linear B cell (LBL) epitopes using appropriate adjuvants and linkers. The vaccine's interaction with human immunological receptors (TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5) was evaluated via molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Finally, the pET-28a(+) plasmid vector from Escherichia coli was used to assess expression capabilities. Results: The proposed MEV was found to be non-allergic, stable, and highly antigenic for human use. Computational simulations, including molecular docking and MD, demonstrated strong binding affinity and stable molecular interactions between the MEV and target immune receptors. In silico cloning results further confirmed the expression potential of the vaccine within the Discussion: Based on these computational findings, the designed MEV shows significant promise for establishing protective immunity against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.