ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Models of cartilage repair with autologous mesenchymal stem cells seeded on scaffolds: a systematic narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and Strategies in Hydrogel-Based Cartilage Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Green and Scalable Manufacturing of Biodegradable Polymer Scaffolds: Solvent-Free Processing, Supercritical COPolymers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Focal post-traumatic cartilage lesions frequently progress to early osteoarthritis, highlighting the limited regenerative capacity of adult articular cartilage. Compared to native tissue, conventional surgical interventions often produce fibrocartilage with inferior biomechanical properties, representing a persistent therapeutic challenge. This review assessed preclinical studies exploring cartilage repair strategies using autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in animal models. MSCs therapies demonstrated superior cartilage regeneration, matrix organization, and integration into the surrounding tissue compared to the control groups. The most efficient source was found to be bone marrow - derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) combined with biodegradable scaffolds, suggesting their potential in tissue engineering applications. Despite methodological heterogeneity across studies - including variations in stem cells sources, implant types, and deliver strategies - cumulative evidence strongly supports the regenerative potential of autologous MSCs for cartilage repair. Current research identifies key knowledge gaps, including the absence of standardized experimental protocols and limited insight into the mechanisms of tissue remodeling and maturation. Collectively, these gaps limit direct clinical translation, highlighting the need for further, standardized studies in large animal models with long-term follow-up (>2 years) to assess integration, functional maturation, and the full regenerative potential of the repair tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.