ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2026
Acceptability of and Barriers to Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Receiving Chronic Hemodialysis: Research Letter.
Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals receiving hemodialysis is more accurate than hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and may improve diabetes management in this population, but little is known regarding patient perspectives on CGM technology and its use in clinical outpatient hemodialysis care. We aimed to explore the real-world acceptability of CGM use in nonhospitalized individuals receiving hemodialysis. This pragmatic prospective observational study was nested within a qualitative improvement initiative that embedded an endocrinologist providing care for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c greater than 8% within the hemodialysis unit. As part of this initiative, some people seen by the endocrinologist were prescribed CGMs. These individuals were approached to participate in the study and followed for 2 weeks during CGM wear. Reasons for CGM decline were collected and collated inductively using content analysis. Of 47 consults, only 22 (47%) people were prescribed CGM. Of these, six (27%) declined CGM use and only six (27%) consented to the study, but ultimately only three participants (13.6%) completed the study. Reasons for CGM decline included lack of comfort with technology, cost and poor cellphone, internet and data availability. Our findings suggest that further exploration of barriers to CGM use and solutions to these barriers is required prior to broad use of CGM in real-world outpatient hemodialysis settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.