ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
The gut is guilty! Will legalomics transform forensic and legal psychology?
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenging the prescientific frameworks of criminal justice: neurobiology and criminolytic interventions in the legalome era.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple lines of converging research are supporting the idea that gut microbes play an outsized role in human cognition and behavior. Here in this perspective article, we argue that emergent gut-brain-microbiota research, and associated advances in multi-omics technologies, are destined to be of high-level relevance to forensic and legal psychology. After summarizing neural, immune, endocrine, and metabolic channels by which gut ecosystems can modulate behavior-relevant brain states, and discussing causal inferences from microbiota-transfer and adjacent human evidence, we present auto-brewery syndrome as a bounded legal precedent for microbiome-mediated impairment. The available evidence allows for a visualized future in which legalomics-the disciplined use of microbiome and omics evidence in prevention, treatment, competency, mitigation, risk assessments, reintegration care, correctional health, and professional wellness-is in the prevue of forensic and legal psychology. Framed by neurorights, we offer a series of ideas for future directions, with possible ways to strengthen research within ethical frameworks. Using auto-brewery syndrome as an example, we argue that the legalome offers forensic and legal psychology a way to calibrate, rather than replace, biopsychosocial judgement. Microbial signatures and legalomics-reliably obtained and narrowly construed-might one day help us judge more justly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.