ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
An efficient non-invasive model for predicting cognitive impairment based on comprehensive geriatric assessment: Machine learning and SHAP analysis.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With global aging, cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer's disease and related dementias, has become a critical public health challenge, driving the need for convenient screening tools to facilitate early intervention. Objective: This study aimed to develop an efficient and noninvasive risk assessment model for identifying potential cognitive impairment in the elderly using machine learning algorithms based on comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Methods: We included 1410 participants aged 50 and older from geriatric clinics and community. Feature selection was performed on the CGA indicators using a combination of expert knowledge and machine learning. Logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes, support vector machines, neural networks, and random forests were comprehensively evaluated based on common classification performance metrics. The optimal machine learning algorithms and feature subset are used to construct the final prediction model. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to explain the model. Results: Thirteen noninvasive predictors were identified, including 'Bathing', 'Age', 'Caregiver', 'Sleep duration', 'Homekeeping', 'Right Ear', 'Stand BWEO', 'Hobbies', 'Focusing Difficulty', 'UI effect', and 'Housework'. The LR model performed best on the test set, with an AUC of 0.877 and high accuracy (0.815), sensitivity (0.767), and specificity (0.827). The SHAP results illustrated the role of these key features in cognitive impairment, which is highly consistent with clinical knowledge. Conclusions: This study identifies convenient, noninvasive predictors for screening-oriented prediction of cognitive impairment, develops an efficient machine learning model, and employs SHAP analysis for interpretation. This facilitates widespread screening, providing guidance for early detection and intervention in high-risk populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.